Yahoo! Site Explorer - A review of Yahoo! Site Explorer
Now that Yahoo! has updated its Site Explorer service we should all be looking to see what we can learn from Yahoo! about our search engine optimization. I’ve been beating up on the SEO community for years for relying on Yahoo!’s backlink reports and I haven’t changed my position on that practice. You cannot learn anything about what Google knows from Yahoo!. But you can certainly learn more about what Yahoo! knows now than before they updated the Site Explorer service. In fact, on first glance, the new Site Explorer seems to be more honest and forthcoming than Google Webmaster Tools. If you cannot trust an analytic tool, you have no reason to use it. And, trust me, none of us has any reason to use Google Webmaster Tools for link analysis.
| Yahoo! Statistics For Sample Domain | |
|---|---|
| Indexed Pages: | 4,665 |
| Crawled Pages: | 2,081 |
| Known Pages: | 4,665 |
| Known Hosts on This Site: | 12 |
| Hosts linking to Site: | 1,844 |
| Domains linking to Site: | 1,601 |
| Hosts Outlinked from Site: | 986 |
| Domains linked from Site: | 893 |
There are some odd numbers in this report, but they may be explainable. For example, where did the 12 hosts come from? The domain does not have that many hosts (a host would be either a sub-domain or the primary domain). If I allow for a lack of canonical authority (other sites lacking sub-domains show 2 hosts) and a couple of sub-domains that have only been created (they have no content and nothing links to them), I can justify 12 but how would Yahoo! know about two undeveloped sub-domains? Optimizing minds want to know.
The Crawled Pages (2,081) number looks about right but the Known/Indexed Pages (4,665) are just bizarre. Even allowing for many thousands of pages that once existed on that domain, none of them have been there for many years. Could there possibly be THAT MANY inbound links pointing to 404 pages? Like, WOW.
Yahoo!, on the other hand, has historically made up page URLs and fetched them to test the way domains handle their 404 error handling. There was a time when I conveniently redirected all 404 traffic on my domains to either the root URLs or the site maps, sending a Code 200 OK. Browsers don’t have a problem with that behavior. Search engines do.
To keep Yahoo! from indexing an endless number of bogus duplicate pages, I switched my 404 handling on all domains to serve up a custom 404 document that sends the right code. Perhaps all those Known/Indexed pages that don’t exist came from Yahoo!’s unauthorized URL generation. I don’t know, but that was never a nice thing to do to unsuspecting Webmasters. I don’t know if Yahoo! is any better behaved now than in the past because I just tell everyone to handle 404 traffic according to RFC specifications (or to implement 301 redirects, but that gets tedious).
There is no way to verify the number of hosts/domains Yahoo! claims are linking to the domain, but I like the tallies because they provide an opportunity for snapshot analysis. Even if there is a wide margin of error, knowing that Domain A has an estimated 1800 hosts linking to it and Domain B has an estimated 300 hosts linking to it gives me an idea of how much Web Visibility the two domains have with respect to each other.
Web Visibility helps with search visibility because of the crawling and anchor text and PageRank-like valuations that search engines confer, but you want to get as much traffic from referring non-search sites as possible. A domain with strong Web Visibility has more marketing opportunities than a domain with weak Web Visibility.
You can authenticate a sub-domain to get more detailed data and to upload XML/RSS Sitemaps (feeds). The verbose formats for the Pages and Inlinks reports provide a little more data than we used to get. The Verbose Pages report will tell you what language a page is in and when it was last crawled. The Verbose Inlinks report will only tell you what language the page is in.
While Google is more forthcoming about queries your site ranks for, inbound link anchor text pointing to your site, and crawl management, Yahoo!’s reports are more concise and better organized, although it would be nice if we could export all the data from the Yahoo! reports to a file.
Yahoo! search optimization has fallen out of favor. As more people focus on Google, fewer people develop their Yahoo! potential to its fullest. Many SEO forums are filled with people who claim they get little to no traffic from Yahoo!. Yahoo! is still the third most visited search engine in the industry, servicing nearly 60,000,000 people each month. That’s a lot of traffic and no one should be turning their back on it.
My sites do okay by Yahoo! but they could do better. Once in a while I come back and tweak things a bit. Now that Site Explorer is providing some decent information, I may spend a little more time building up my personal Yahoo! traffic.
www.seo-theory.com
published @ October 7, 2008